1. James B. Summitt, J. William Robbins, Thomas J. Hilton, Richard S. Schwartz, Jose, Jr. DOS Santos. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary approach quintessence Pub Co; 3rd ed. January 31, 2006; chapter8.
2. Roberson MT, Heymann OH, Swift JR. Art and science of operative dentistry. 5th ed. USA: Mosby; 2006: Chap 5.
3. Alavi AA, Kianimanesh N. Microleakage of direct and indirectcomposite restorations with three dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent, 2002; 27(1): 19‐24.
4. AsmussenE. Clinical relevance of physical, chemical and bondingproperties of composite resins. Oper Dent, 1985; 10(2): 61‐73.
5. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, and Wei SH. The over wet phenomenon: a transmission electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid conditioned, resin‐dentin interface. Am J Dent, 1996; 9(4): 161‐166.
6. Samimi P, Porkamyar F. Adhesive in Dentistry. Esfahan; Mani, 2002; p. 20-27, 87-95.
7. Walls AW, Lee J, McCabeJF. The bonding of composite resin tomoist enamel. Br Dent J, 2001; 191(3): 148‐150.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801124 [
DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.4801124a]
8. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Operative dentistry, 1997; 22(4): 173-185.
9. Susin AH, Vasconcellos WA, Saad JR, Oliveira Junior OB. Tensile bond strength of self-etching versus total-etching adhesive systems under different dentinal substrate conditions. Braz Oral Res. 2007; 21(1):81-6. [
DOI:10.1590/S1806-83242007000100014]
10. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasudo N. Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthetic Dent, 1991; 3(4): 133-138 [
DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00985.x]
11. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Cardoso PE, Ferrari M. Influence of substrate,Shape and thickness on micro tensile specimens' structural integrity and their measured Bond strengths. Dent Mater, 2004; 20(7):643-54. [
DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2003.08.009]
12. Craig RG, Power JM, Sakaguchi RL. Restorative Dental Material. 12th ed USA: Mosby Elsevier 2006; Chapter 2, 10.
13. Google G, Farrarim M. New adhesive material science. JADA June, 2000; 30-34.
14. Davari AR, Danesh kazemi AR, mousavinasab M, Modaresi SJ, Mohammadi Z, Teymouri S. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of total‐etch and self‐etch adhesive systems. Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. 2010; 11(1): 28‐34.
15. Saunders WP, Saunders EM. Microleakage of bonding agents with wet and dry bonding techniques. Am J Dent. 1996; 9(1):34-36.
16. Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S. Marginal leakage of filled Dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques. Am J Dent, 2000; 13(2): 93‐97.
17. da Silva MA, Rangel PM, Barcellos DC, Pagani C, Rocha Gomes Torres C. Bond strength of adhesive systems with different solvents to dry and wet dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract.2013; 14(1):9-13. [
DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1261]
18. Munchow EA, Valente LL, Bossardi M, Priebe TC, Zanchi CH, Piva E. Influence of surface moisture condition on the bond strength to dentin of etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Braz J Oral Sci. 2014; 13(3):182-186. [
DOI:10.1590/1677-3225v13n3a04]
19. Manso AP, Marquezini L Jr, Silva SM, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Carvalho RM. Stability of wet versus dry bonding with different solvent-based adhesives. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(4):476-482. [
DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.009]
20. Swift E, Triolo P. Bond strength of scotch bond multi-purpose to moist dentin and enamel. Am J Dent. 1992; 5(6): 318-320
21. Xie J, Powers J, McGuckin R. In-vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 295-299. [
DOI:10.1016/0109-5641(93)90046-S]
22. Yasini E, Malekan E. Comparison of shear bond strength of unfilled resin to dry enamel and dentin bonding on dry and wet enamel. Journal of Dentistry Tehran Universityof Medical Sciences and Health Services, 2005; 18(1): 15-20.