Volume 10, Issue 1 (10-2014)
ijpd 2014, 10(1): 59-68 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
afshar H, ghandehari M, amiri S, mirzayi Z, pourali M, najafi M. The effect of enamel moisture on tensile bond strength of composite resin using Single bond in total etch technique. ijpd 2014; 10 (1) :59-68
URL: http://jiapd.ir/article-1-56-en.html
URL: http://jiapd.ir/article-1-56-en.html
Abstract: (5722 Views)
Background and Aim: Tooth colored restorations are so common nowadays due to increased esthetic needs. A successful composite restoration demands a strong bonding with lowest microleakage. Close relation between tooth surface and the other adherents is an important factor in bond strength. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of enamel moisture on tensile bond strength of composite resins using Single bond in total etch technique. Materials and methods: In this in vitro study, 40 premolar teeth were randomly divided into two equal groups. Enamel surface of the teeth were polished using a disk in midbuccal portion. The roots were dissected from 2mm below CEJ and midbuccal portion of the teeth were etched. In one group after rinsing the etchant, tooth surface was dried completely (group I). In the other group the surface moisture was removed using cotton pellet (group II). Single Bond (3M) was applied on desired surfaces and cured. Composite resin was layered over the tooth surface to 4mm height. The teeth were then mounted in the way that they can be placed in the holding device from lingual side. After that the teeth were placed in UTM device under tensile stress with the rate of 0.5 mm/min. the failure surface was examined to detect type and location of the failure. The data were analyzed using T-Test and Fisher's Exact test. Results: Data showed that although mean bond strength in group I was higher but the difference was not statistically significant. Type of failure in two groups was not statistically significant either. Conclusion: Considering that there is no significant difference between the two groups and a little moisture is needed for creation of hybrid layer and bonding to dentine, leaving a bit moisture on enamel equal to that of dentine does not interfere with bonding to enamel and produce a good bond strength.
Type of Article: Research Article |
Subject:
General
Received: 2015/10/4 | Accepted: 2015/10/4 | Published: 2015/10/4
Received: 2015/10/4 | Accepted: 2015/10/4 | Published: 2015/10/4
References
1. Summit J, William Robbins J, Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, dos Santos JJ. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A
2. Roberson MT, Heymann OH, Swift JR. Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 6th ed.USA: Mosby; 2013.chapter 4 and 8.
3. Yasini E. Comparison of shear bond strength of unfilled resin to dry enamel and dentin bonding on dry and wet enamel. Journal of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2005; 1:15-20.
4. Susin AH, Vasconcellos WA, Saad JR, Oliveira Junior OB. Tensile bond strength of self-etching versus totaletching adhesive systems under different dentinal substrate conditions. Braz Oral Res 2007; 21:81-6. [DOI:10.1590/S1806-83242007000100014]
5. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 1955; 34:849-53. [DOI:10.1177/00220345550340060801]
6. Walls AW, Lee J, McCabe JF. The bonding of composite resin to moist enamel. Br Dent J 2001; 191:148‐50. [DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.4801124a]
7. Swift E, Triolo P. Bond strength of scotch bond multi-purpose to moist dentin and enamel. Am J Dent 1992; 5:318-20.
8. Xie J, Powers J, Mc Guckin R. In-vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993;9:295-99. [DOI:10.1016/0109-5641(93)90046-S]
9. Wakefielo CW, Sneed WD, Draughn RA, Davis TN. Composite bonding to dentin and enamel of humidity. Gen Dent 1996; 44:508-12.
10. Torii Y, Itou K, Hikasa R, Iwat A, Nishitani Y. Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin enamel interface crated by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:525-33. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00855.x]
11. Moli K, Gartner T, Haller B. Effect of moist bonding on composite/enamel bond strength. Am J Dent 2002; 15:85- 90.
12. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasudo N. Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthetic Dent 1991; 3:133-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00985.x]
13. Kato G, Nakabayashi N. The durability of adhesion to phosphoric acid etched wet dentin substrates. Dent Mater 1998; 14:347-52. [DOI:10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00003-2]
14. Leite FRM, Capote TSO, Zuanon ACC. Application of the total etching technique or self-etching primers on primary teeth after air abrasion. Braz Oral Res 2005;19:198-202 [DOI:10.1590/S1806-83242005000300008]
15. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: Etching effects on ungrounded enamel. Dent Mater 2001;17:430-44 [DOI:10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00104-4]
16. Walls AW, Leey MC, Cabe JF. The bonding of composite resin to moist enamel. Br Dent J 2001; 191:148-50. [DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.4801124a]
17. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Cardoso PE, Ferrari M. Influence of substrate, shape, and thickness on microtensile specimens' structural integrity and their measured bond strengths. Dent Mater 2004; 20:643-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2003.08.009]
18. Craig RG, Power JM, Sakaguchi RL. Restorative Dental Material.12th ed USA: Mosby Elsevier 2006. Chapter 2,10.
19. Cortés O, García C, Pérez L, Bravo LA. A comparison of the bond strength to enamel and dentin of two compomers: an in vitro study. ASDC J Dent Child 1998; 65:29-31.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
