Volume 15, Issue 1 ( AUTUMN-WINTER 2019)
ijpd 2019, 15(1): 93-102 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rabani M, Aref P, Askarizadeh N, Ashrafitamay I. Comparison of the antibacterial effect of nanosilver and chlorhexidine mouthwash on Streptococcus mutans (invitro). ijpd 2019; 15 (1) :93-102
URL: http://jiapd.ir/article-1-263-en.html
URL: http://jiapd.ir/article-1-263-en.html
Assistant professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (2589 Views)
Background: Many bacteria are involved in dental plaque formation and caries. Streptococcus mutans is one of the most important bacteria involved in this case. One of the ways to control plaque is the use of mouthwash on the side of toothbrushes and toothbrushes. Although chlorhexidine is the most effective mouthwash against oral microorganisms, the side effects of long-term use suggest the need for an alternative. The purpose of this study was to compare the antibacterial effect of nanosilver and chlorhexidine mouthwash on Streptococcus mutans in pediatric ward of Dental School of Islamic Azad University of Tehran and Laboratory of Veterinary School of Tehran University in 1397-1398.
Materials and methods: This experimental study was performed in vitro on Streptococcus mutans. Experiments were performed on two groups of case (nanosilver mouthwash) and control (chlorhexidine mouthwash) in three parts. Antimicrobial potency was measured by Disk diffusion assay by measuring inhibitory zone diameter. Then both micro and macro dilution methods were used to measure MIC (Minimum bacterial growth Inhibitor Concentration) and finally for measure MBC (Minimum Bactericidal Concentration) using Blood agar dilution method.
Results: Statistical analysis showed that the nanosilver mouthwash has no inhibitory zone and MBC. Also its MIC was higher than chlorhexine and this difference was statistically significant (P <0.001).
Conclusion: According to the results of the in vitro study of nanosilver mouthwash compared to chlorhexidine, it has minor bacteriostatic properties and no bactericidal effect. It is recommended to repeat this study by changing the mouthwash formulation in terms of particle concentration and diameter.
Materials and methods: This experimental study was performed in vitro on Streptococcus mutans. Experiments were performed on two groups of case (nanosilver mouthwash) and control (chlorhexidine mouthwash) in three parts. Antimicrobial potency was measured by Disk diffusion assay by measuring inhibitory zone diameter. Then both micro and macro dilution methods were used to measure MIC (Minimum bacterial growth Inhibitor Concentration) and finally for measure MBC (Minimum Bactericidal Concentration) using Blood agar dilution method.
Results: Statistical analysis showed that the nanosilver mouthwash has no inhibitory zone and MBC. Also its MIC was higher than chlorhexine and this difference was statistically significant (P <0.001).
Conclusion: According to the results of the in vitro study of nanosilver mouthwash compared to chlorhexidine, it has minor bacteriostatic properties and no bactericidal effect. It is recommended to repeat this study by changing the mouthwash formulation in terms of particle concentration and diameter.
Type of Article: Research Article |
Subject:
General
Received: 2019/12/27 | Accepted: 2019/12/27 | Published: 2019/12/27
Received: 2019/12/27 | Accepted: 2019/12/27 | Published: 2019/12/27
References
1. F.Ahrari, N.Eslami, O.Rajabi, K.Ghazvini and S.Barati. The antimicrobial sensitivity of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sangius to colloidal solutions of different nanoparticles applied as mouthwashes. Dental Research Journal, 2015 Jan-Feb;12(1): 44-49 [DOI:10.4103/1735-3327.150330] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Mohammad mehdi Solan dalal, Hussein Dargahi, fariborz Mehrani, Mohammad kazem Sharifi yazdi, Abbas Rahimi froshani, Seyed asghar Miremadi.The role of Streptococcus Muttans In Dental Caries In Two Groups Of sensitive And Resistance children age 3 to 5 years. Payavard Salamat J,2013; 6(6)467-477 [Persian]
3. Wennström JL, Dahlén G, Gröndahl K, Heijl L. Periodic subgingival antimicrobial irrigation of periodontal pockets (II). Microbiological and radiographical observations. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1987;14(9):573-80 [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.1987.tb01518.x] [PMID]
4. Newman MG, Takei HH, Carranza FA. 10th ed. Ch. 6. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2006. Clinical Periodontology; p. 42.
5. Shah HM, Shah MN, Gokani VN, Jethal BS. A comparative, qualitative and quantitative antimicrobial efficacies of mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine gluconate and essential oils. Indian J Dent Res. 1993;4(3-4):103-111.
6. O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972;43(1):38. [DOI:10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38] [PMID]
7. Garnett JA, Matthews S. Interactions in bacterial Biofilm development: A structural Perspective. Current Protein and Peptide Science 2012; 13: 739-55. [DOI:10.2174/138920312804871166] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Wennström JL, Dahlén G, Gröndahl K, Heijl L. Periodic subgingival antimicrobial irrigation of periodontal pockets (II). Microbiological and radiographical observations. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1987;14(9):573-80 [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.1987.tb01518.x] [PMID]
9. Eriksen HM, Nordbö H. Extrinsic discoloration of teeth. J Clin Periodontol 1978; 5: 229-32. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.1978.tb01916.x] [PMID]
10. Paknejad M, Jafarzade Ts, Shamloo Am. Comparison of the efficacy of Matrica and 0.2% cholorhexidine mouthwashes in patients with chronic periodontitis. J Islamic Dent Assoc 2006; 18(3): 92-7. (Persian)
11. Abd EI Rahman Hf, Skaug N, Francis Gw. In vitro antimicrobial effects of crude miswak extract on oral pathogen. Saudi Dent J 2002; 14(1): 26-32.
12. Haghighati F, Jafari S, Beitollahi J. Comparison of antimicrobial effects of ten Herbal extracts with chlorhexidine on three different oral pathogens: An in vitro study. Hakim Res J 2003; 6(3): 71-6. (Persian)
13. Haffajee AD, Yaskell T, Sokransky SS. Antimicrobial effectiveness of an herbal mouthrinse compared with an essential oil and a chlorhexidine mouthrinse. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139(5): 606-17. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0222] [PMID]
14. Hernández-Sierra JF, Ruiz F, Pena DC, Martínez-Gutiérrez F, Martínez AE, Guillén Ade J, et al. The antimicrobial sensitivity of Streptococcus mutans to nanoparticles of silver, zinc oxide, and gold. Nanomedicine. 2008;4(3):237-240. [DOI:10.1016/j.nano.2008.04.005] [PMID]
15. Shrivastava S, T Bera, A Roy, G Singh, P Ramachandrarao and D Dash. Characterization of enhanced antibacterial effects of nano silver nano particles. J Nanotechnology. 2007;18(22):103-125. [DOI:10.1088/0957-4484/18/22/225103]
16. Hidalgo E, Domínguez C. Study of cytotoxicity mechanisms of silver nitrate in human dermal fibroblasts. Toxicology Letters. 1998; 98(3):169-179. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-4274(98)00114-3]
17. Lee HJ, Yeo SY, S H Jeong. Antibacterial effect of nanosized silver colloidal solution on textile fabrics. J Materials science. 2003;38(10):2199-2204. [DOI:10.1023/A:1023736416361]
18. G.Holla, R.Yeluri and K.Munshi. Evaluation of minimum inhibitory and minimum bactericidal concentration of nanosilver base inorganic anti-microbial agent (Novaron®) against streptococcus mutans.Contemporary clinical dentistry. 2012;3(3): 288-293 [DOI:10.4103/0976-237X.103620] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Brett DW. A discussion of silver as an antimicrobial agent: Alleviating the confusion. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006; 52(1):34-41.
20. Williams RL, Doherty PJ, Vince DG, Grashoff GJ, Williams DF. The biocompatibility of silver. Critical Reviews in Biocompatibility. 1989; 5(3):221-243.
21. Bragg PD, Rainnie DJ. The effect of silver ions on the respiratory chain of Escherichia coli. Can J Microbiol. 1974; 20(6):883-889. [DOI:10.1139/m74-135] [PMID]
22. Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27(1):76-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.002] [PMID]
23. Holister P, Weener JW, Romas Vas C, Harper T. Nanoparticles. Technology white papers 3. London: Sientific Ltd; 2003. pp. 2-11.
24. Stobie N, Duffy B, McCormack DE, Colreavy J, Hidalgo M, McHale P, et al. Prevention of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation using a low-temperature processed silver-doped phenyltriethoxysilane sol-gel coating. Biomaterials. 2008;29(8):963-69 [DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.057] [PMID]
25. Melaiye A, Youngs WJ. Silver and its application as an antimicrobial agent. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2005;15(2):125-130. [DOI:10.1517/13543776.15.2.125]
26. Kariminik.A and Motaghi.MM. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Streptococcus Mutans Isolated from Dental Plaques to Chlorhexidine, Nanosil and Common Antibiotics. International journal of life science. 2015;9(2): 18-21 [DOI:10.3126/ijls.v9i2.12040]
27. Fattahi Dolat Abadi.M, Mehrabian.S, Asgari.B, Ebrahimzadeh Namavar.A, F.Ezzatifar.F, A.Rastegar Lari.A. Silver nanoparticles as active ingredient used for alcohol-free mouthwash. GMS Hyg Infect control. 2013; 8(1): Doc05
28. A.Kaladhar Reddy, Prabhurag B, Kambalyal, Santosh R Patil, M Vankhre, Yaser Ahmad Khan, T Ramanna Kumar. Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Silver, Titanium. J Orthod Sci.2016 Oct-Dec; 5(4): 127-131 [DOI:10.4103/2278-0203.192115] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. V. Esfahanian, F. Mohamadi, SH. Amini . An In Vitro Comparison of Antimicrobial Effect of Nanosil and ChlorhexidineMouthrinses. Journal of Islamic Dental Association of IRAN (JIDAI) / Fall 2012 /24 / (3)
30. Al-sharani A, Al-Hajj W & Madfa A. Clinical efficacy of nanosilver and chlorhexidine in the treatment of plaque-induced gingivitis: randomized controlled clinical trial. J Oral Res 2018; 7(7):238-244 [DOI:10.17126/joralres.2018.064]
31. P. Divya Kumari, Shilpa M. Shenoy, Shahnawaz Khijmatgar, Avidyuti Chowdhury, Edward Lynch, Chitta R. Chowdhury, Antibacterial activity of new atraumatic restorative treatment materials incorporated with Azadirachta indica (Neem) against Streptococcus mutans, Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research,2019;9(4) 321-325, [DOI:10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.06.014] [PMID] [PMCID]
32. Ahn S-J,Cho E-J,Kim H-J,Park S-N, Lim Y-K,Kook J-K. The antimicrobial effect of deglycyrrhizinated licorice root extract on Streptococcus mutans UA159 in both planktonic and biofilm cultures. Anaerobe.2012; 18(6):590-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.10.005] [PMID]
33. Ahn S-J, Soon-Nang Park , Young Ju Lee , Eun-Jung Cho, Yun Kyong Lim, Xue Min Li. Invitro antimicrobial activities of 1-Methoxyficifolionol, Licorisoflavan A, and 6,8-Diprenylgenistein against streptococcus mutans. Caries Res 2015; 49(1): 78-89 [DOI:10.1159/000362676] [PMID]
34. Sukumaran Prabhu, Eldho K Poulose. Silver nanoparticles: mechanism of antimicrobial action, synthesis, medical applications, and toxicity effects. inl-journal.2012;2(32) [DOI:10.1186/2228-5326-2-32]
35. Liangpeng, Qingtao, Meng Wang, Jun Ouyang, Xiaojian Li, Malcolm MQ Xing. Nanosilver particles in medical applications: synthesis, performance, and toxicity. International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014:9 2399-2407 [DOI:10.2147/IJN.S55015] [PMID] [PMCID]
36. Ji JH, Jung JH, Kim SS, et al. Twenty-eight-day inhalation toxicity study of silver nanoparticles in Sprague-Dawley rats. Inhal Toxicol. 2007;19(10):857-871. [DOI:10.1080/08958370701432108] [PMID]
37. Lee KJ, Nallathamby PD, Browning LM, Osgood CJ, Xu XH. In vivo imaging of transport and biocompatibility of single silver nanoparticles in early development of zebrafish embryos. ACS Nano. 2007;1(2):133-143. [DOI:10.1021/nn700048y] [PMID] [PMCID]
38. Borum AE and Güneş E. Antibacterial effect of different concentrations of silver nanoparticles. Pak Vet J, 2018, 38(3): 321-324 [DOI:10.29261/pakvetj/2018.031]
39. Niakan,M, Azimi.H, Jafarian.Z, MohammadtaghiG, Niakan.S, Mostafavizade,S. Evaluation of Nanosilver Solution Stability against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2013 Aug; 6(6): e8570. [DOI:10.5812/jjm.8570]
40. Esfahanian.v, Mohamadi.F,. Amini .SH. An In Vitro Comparison of Antimicrobial Effect of Nanosil and ChlorhexidineMouthrinses. Journal of Islamic Dental Association of IRAN (JIDAI) / Fall 2012 /24 / (3)
41. Priscila L.L. Freire1, Allan J.R. Albuquerque2, Fabio C. Sampaio2, André Galembeck3, Miguel A. P. Flores3, Thayza C. M. Stamford3,et al. AgNPs: The New Allies Against S. Mutans Biofilm - A Pilot Clinical Trial and Microbiological Assay. Brazilian Dental Journal (2017) 28(4): 417-422 [DOI:10.1590/0103-6440201600994] [PMID]
42. Azimi Laysar H, Niakan M, Mohammad Taghi G, Jafarian Z, Mostafavizade M, Niakan S. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of various concentrations of Nigella Sativa and Nanosilver on the growth of S.sanguis and S. mutans. J Res Dent Sci. 2013; 9 (4) :179-186
43. Zhong Lu , Kaifeng Rong , Ju Li , Hao Yang ,Rong Chen. Size-dependent antibacterial activities of silver nanoparticles against oral anaerobic pathogenic bacteria. J Mater Sci: Mater Med (2013) 24:1465-1471 [DOI:10.1007/s10856-013-4894-5] [PMID]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
