Volume 13, Issue 2 (spring & summer 2018)
ijpd 2018, 13(2): 53-62 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Shaker dolagh A, Hoseinzadeh M. The effect of neuro feedback on children's anxiety in dentistry. ijpd 2018; 13 (2) :53-62
URL: http://jiapd.ir/article-1-182-en.html
URL: http://jiapd.ir/article-1-182-en.html
Abstract: (2347 Views)
Background:dental anxiety in children is indicated as a problem in controlling the patients. The effect of this fear continues tilladolescence and leads to prevention from dentist tasks which outcome is loss of mouth health. Therefore, the present study was carried out by the purpose of examining the effectiveness of neuro feedback on children dental anxiety.
Materials and methods:the methodology of this study is semi-experimental. The statistical population of the research includes all the children in 9 to 12 years old referring to dentistry centers of Tabriz in 2017.They are selected through on random sampling as 26 people using the questionnaire of dentist anxiety and randomly assigned into two experimental (8 individuals) and control groups (8 individuals). The experimental group was under neuro feedback therapy for 5 weeks, in 3-30 min sessions a week and control group did not receive the same training as the intervention group. Data was analyzed by SPSS software and MANOVA.
Results:Based on the research findings there is significant relationship between pretest scores and post-test's in two groups. The pre-test anxiety scores in both groups were close to 16 and after the treatment of neuro feedback, the mean anxiety of the experimental group was reduced to 9, but the mean anxiety level of the control group was 16, thus, the neuro feedback treatment reduced the dental anxiety of the children in the experimental group.
Conclusion:These results indicates that this method, like other treatment and replacing techniques could be used to decrease children dental anxiety.
Materials and methods:the methodology of this study is semi-experimental. The statistical population of the research includes all the children in 9 to 12 years old referring to dentistry centers of Tabriz in 2017.They are selected through on random sampling as 26 people using the questionnaire of dentist anxiety and randomly assigned into two experimental (8 individuals) and control groups (8 individuals). The experimental group was under neuro feedback therapy for 5 weeks, in 3-30 min sessions a week and control group did not receive the same training as the intervention group. Data was analyzed by SPSS software and MANOVA.
Results:Based on the research findings there is significant relationship between pretest scores and post-test's in two groups. The pre-test anxiety scores in both groups were close to 16 and after the treatment of neuro feedback, the mean anxiety of the experimental group was reduced to 9, but the mean anxiety level of the control group was 16, thus, the neuro feedback treatment reduced the dental anxiety of the children in the experimental group.
Conclusion:These results indicates that this method, like other treatment and replacing techniques could be used to decrease children dental anxiety.
Type of Article: Research Article |
Subject:
General
Received: 2018/09/22 | Accepted: 2018/09/22 | Published: 2018/09/22
Received: 2018/09/22 | Accepted: 2018/09/22 | Published: 2018/09/22
References
1. Farokhgisou, E. Hashemipor, S. & Azhdary H. (2008). The influence of music on pain sensation and fear in children during dental treatments. J dentistry; 9(1): 93-100.
2. Frere, CL. Crout. R/ Yorty. J. McNeil. DW. (2001). Effects of audiovisual distraction during dental prophylaxis. J Am Dent Assoc; 132(7):1031-1038. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0309] [PMID]
3. Hakeberg, M. Berggren, U. & Gröndahl, HG. (1993). A radiographic study of dental health in adult patients with dental anxiety. Community Dentistry Oral Epidemiol; 21(1): 27-30. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0528.1993.tb00714.x] [PMID]
4. Rabiei, M. (2001). The effect of individual in group cognitive behavior therapy on reduce of exam anxiety among Bruojen students [MA Thesis in Persian]. Isfahan, Iran: Isfahan University.
5. Udoye, CH. Oginni, AO. Oginni, FO. (2005). Dental anxiety among patients undergoing various dental treatmentsin a Nigerian teaching hospital. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice; 6(2): 91-98. [DOI:10.5005/jcdp-6-2-91] [PMID]
6. Morvatisharifabad,MA.Razavinia,M.Haerian,A.Fallahzadeh,H.[Stuady of dental anxiety on Mashhad dental patients]Journal of Toloe Behdasht Yazd 2013,11(2):119-130.(Persian).
7. Nilchian,F.Mohammadi,A.[Assesment of the level of dental anxiety in 10-12 year-old students in Sahr-e-Kord city]Journal of Isfahan dental Faculty.2013,9(5):451-458.(Persian).
8. Vermaire, JH. De Jongh, A & Aartman I. (2008). Dental anxiety and quality of life: the effect of dental treatment. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008 Oct; 36(5):409-16.9. Hammond, D. (2006). Cowpat isneurofeedback? J Neurotherapy; 10:25-36. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00416.x] [PMID]
9. Lubar, JF. (2003). Neurofeedback for the management of attention deficit disorders. In: Schwarts MS, Andrasik F, editors. Biofeedback: A Practitioners guide. 3rded. New York: The Guilford Press, 409-437.
10. Kouijzer, J. van Schie, HT. de Moor, JM. Gerrits, B. & Buitelaar, JK. (2009). Neurofeedback treatment in autism. Preliminary findings in behavioral, cognitive, and neurophysiological functioning. Journal of Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders; 4: 386-399. [DOI:10.1016/j.rasd.2009.10.007]
11. Vernon, D. Egner, T. Cooper, N. Compton, T. Neilands, C. & Sheri, A. (2003). The effect of training distinct neurofeedback protocols on aspects of cognitive performance. Int J Psychophysiol; 47(1): 75-85. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-8760(02)00091-0]
12. Angelakis, E. Stathopoulou, S. Frymiare, JL. Green, DL. Lubar, JF. Kounios, J. (2007). EEG neurofeedback: A brief overview and an example of peak alpha frequency training for cognitive enhancement in the elderly. Clinical Neuropsychologist; 21(1):110-129. [DOI:10.1080/13854040600744839] [PMID]
13. Schwartz, M & Andrasik, F. (2003). Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide. New York: Guilford.
14. Schwartz, M & Andrasik, F. (2005). Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide .4thed. New York: Guilford.
15. Masterpasqua, F. Healey, KN. (2003). Neurofeedback in psychological practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice; 34(6): 652-656. [DOI:10.1037/0735-7028.34.6.652]
16. Hill RW, Castro E. Healing young brains. The neurofeedback solution. Charlottesville, VA: Hampton Roads Publishing Company; 2009.
17. Bazanova OM, Aftanas LI. Individual EEG alpha activity analysis for enhancement neurofeedback efficiency: two case studies. Journal of Neurotherapy 2010; 14(3): 244-253 [DOI:10.1080/10874208.2010.501517]
18. Hammond DC. Lens neurofeedback treatment of anger: Preliminary reports. Journal of Neurotherapy 2010; 14(2): 162-169. [DOI:10.1080/10874201003767213]
19. Hammond DC. Neurofeedback with anxiety and affective disorders. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2005; 14(1): 105-123. [DOI:10.1016/j.chc.2004.07.008] [PMID]
20. Hammond DC. What is neurofeedback? Journal of Neurotherapy 2011; 15(4): 305-36. [DOI:10.1080/10874208.2011.623090]
21. JahanianNajafabadi,A.Salehi,M.Rahmani,M.Imani,H.[The Effect of Neurofeedback Training on Reduce of Anxiety]Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences.2014;11(6):657-663.
22. Carpiniello, B., Baita, A., and Carta, M. G. (2002). Clinical and psychosocial outcomeof patients affected by panic disorderwith or without agoraphobia: results from anaturalistic follow-up study, Eur Psychiatry 17(7), 394-398. [DOI:10.1016/S0924-9338(02)00701-0]
23. Howard KE, Freeman R. Reliability and validity of a faces version of the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale. Int J Paediatric Dent 2007; 17(4): 281-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00830.x] [PMID]
24. Javadinejad S, Farajzadegan Z, Madahain M. Iranian version of a face version of the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale: Transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis. J Res Med Sci 2011; 16(7): 872-877.
25. Moore NC. A review of EEG biofeedback treatment of anxiety disorders. Clin Electroencephalogr 2000; 31(1):1-6. [DOI:10.1177/155005940003100105] [PMID]
26. Moore NC. The neurotherapy of anxiety disorders. Journal of Adult Development 2005; [DOI:10.1007/s10804-005-7031-y]
27. Garrett BL, Silver MP. The use of EMG and alpha biofeedback to relieve test anxiety in college students. In: Wickramasekera I,editor.Biofeedback, Behavior Therapy, and Hypnosis. Chicago: Nelson-Hall; 1976.
28. Heidari AR, Saedi S. The effect of relaxation and gradual stress removal accompanied by biofeedback on theanxiety of the students. Journal of knowledge and research in Applied Psychology 2011; 12(3): 4-11.
29. Isotani T, Tanaka H, Lehmann D, Pascual-Marqui RD, Kochi K, Saito N. Source localization of EEG activity during hypnotically induced anxiety and relaxation. Int J Psychophysiol 2001; 41(2): 143-153. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00197-5]
30. Bakhshyesh, A. Diagnosis and treatment of hyperactivity disorder and attention deficit (ADHD). Yazd: pub Yazd uinversity. 2011; p 234. (Persian)
31. Parshad, O. Role of yoga in stress management. The West Indian Medical Journal 2004; 53(3), 191-194.
32. Lancaste T & Linden D. Functional mange resonance imaging (FMRI) based neuro feedback as a new treatment tool for depression. European Psychiatry 2011; 26(1) 934. [DOI:10.1016/S0924-9338(11)72642-6]
33. Galantino, M. L., Bzdewka, T. M., Eissler-Russo, J. L., & Holbrook, M. L. The impact of modified Hatha Yoga on chronic low back pain: A pilot study. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 2004; 10(2), 56-59.
34. Hammond DC. Neurofeedback treatment of depression with the roshi. Journal of Neurotherapy 2000; 4(2): 45-56. [DOI:10.1300/J184v04n02_06]
35. Monastra VJ, Monastra DM, George S. The Effects of Stimulant Therapy, EEG Biofeedback, and Parenting Style on the Primary Symptoms of Attention-deficit/hyperactivity Disorder. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2002; 27(4): 231-249. [DOI:10.1023/A:1021018700609] [PMID]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
